UT2004 benchmarks:

$ cat /opt/ut2004-demo/Benchmark/benchmark.sh 
#!/bin/sh
ut2004-demo dm-rankin?spectatoronly=1?numbots=12?quickstart=1?attractcam=1 -benchmark -seconds=77 -ini=default.ini -exec=/opt/ut2004-demo/Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

Here are results over the last year and 9 months or so:

2.736331 / 14.235601 / inf fps -- Score = 13.679287        rand[276381637]
5.503653 / 11.982956 / 34.976410 fps -- Score = 11.987910        rand[1886997259]
5.563165 / 12.212557 / 45.396217 fps -- Score = 12.217196        rand[1886997259]
5.556774 / 12.213729 / 46.879482 fps -- Score = 12.218822        rand[1886997259]
3.780525 / 204.517151 / inf fps -- Score = 61.584534        rand[1605499383]
5.914872 / 13.538128 / 115.044312 fps -- Score = 13.543859        rand[1886997259]
5.240792 / 28.211584 / inf fps -- Score = 26.802221        rand[1357638259]
5.196166 / 22.054844 / 60.286556 fps -- Score = 22.120491        rand[1886997259]
7.092757 / 25.348576 / 76.011848 fps -- Score = 25.362152        rand[1886997259]
5.720313 / 21.504700 / 61.338535 fps -- Score = 21.514923        rand[1886997259]
9.163403 / 24.096804 / 88.282417 fps -- Score = 24.170898        rand[1886997259]
4.439383 / 24.573044 / 76.100990 fps -- Score = 24.603319        rand[1886997259]
5.927572 / 27.762682 / 130.561325 fps -- Score = 27.756296        rand[1886997259]
4.238309 / 27.693068 / 95.542274 fps -- Score = 27.792650        rand[1886997259]
8.512435 / 28.529356 / 69.447021 fps -- Score = 28.553085        rand[1886997259]
4.627872 / 30.571907 / 110.623741 fps -- Score = 30.584023        rand[1886997259]
9.365571 / 21.006798 / 141.206314 fps -- Score = 21.015017        rand[1886997259]
6.343858 / 22.841759 / 79.750206 fps -- Score = 22.853823        rand[1886997259]
6.288816 / 22.901237 / 79.940460 fps -- Score = 22.911160        rand[1886997259]
6.933957 / 26.870264 / 115.506584 fps -- Score = 26.882593        rand[1886997259]
4.404226 / 26.891077 / 113.770134 fps -- Score = 26.900879        rand[1886997259]
7.666574 / 27.085035 / 90.499039 fps -- Score = 27.101841        rand[1886997259]
4.793906 / 27.111494 / 113.976692 fps -- Score = 27.120817        rand[1886997259]
5.426033 / 26.120008 / 110.599205 fps -- Score = 26.131107        rand[1886997259]
6.902118 / 25.060440 / 108.251572 fps -- Score = 25.068457        rand[1886997259]
8.680158 / 25.102127 / 113.842644 fps -- Score = 25.109219        rand[1886997259]

It goes up and down, but considering how old this game (and that it performs much better on windows) is somewhat sad, but not surprising.

That last instance was run several minutes ago:

$ cat Results/avgfps-2009-09-30-22-46-48.log UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-09-21_19.13]
x86-64 Linux
 Unknown processor @ 2394 MHz
Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GM GEM 20090712 2009Q2 RC3 

dm-rankin?spectatoronly=1?numbots=12?quickstart=1?attractcam=1 -benchmark -seconds=77 -exitafterdemo -exec=/opt/ut2004-demo/Benchmark/Stuff/botmatchexec.txt

8.680158 / 25.102127 / 113.842644 fps         rand[1886997259]
Score = 25.109219

I think people were getting some 40 FPS in windows....